Lately, I’ve been reading a lot of customer service related posts (go figure) and have been intrigued by this debate. There are those who believe that every customer is valuable no matter what, and should be tirelessly catered to. There are those who are willing to lose customers that cause too much trouble. And there are those who argue that sometimes a customer just isn’t a good fit, and should be “let go”.
I think there’s some validity on both sides of the debate – though it’s never in the company’s best interest to belittle or provoke a customer. The Internet is too dangerous a place to needlessly risk pissing people off. That being said, the basic premise of “The Customer is Always Right” is wrong.
The phrase, made popular by 19th Century department store magnates, Marshall Field and Harry Gordon Selfridge , was merely a marketing tactic. It’s designed to imply that store employees are in a position of virtual servitude to the customer. With this mandate an employee should never speak out of turn or–gasp!–actually disagree with a customer, even if the customer is wrong or out of line. Despite the propaganda, this is no recipe for empowering employees to serve customers to their fullest abilities. Southwest Airlines, by contrast, gets consistently spectacular results by putting customers second.
And anyway, does the Customer is Always Right rule result in a rewarding experience for customers? Can you imagine a personal relationship where the one ground rule is that you are always right? Maybe you’re thinking, yes, I’d love it if my spouse finally conceded that I am always right. But let’s be real: there’s no room in that for a healthy exchange that leads to mutual understanding, growth and positive change. At the end of the day we’d feel patronized, even manipulated, if our loved ones only nodded their head in agreement after everything we said.
Frankly, I care less about being right and more about being heard as a customer. There is nothing more frustrating than a customer service rep who placates you by sending you down another phone tree rather than saying no to your request. There are times I’m in the right and times when I’m not. And I’m okay with that. But let’s have a conversation about it so that we can both learn and, together, improve the product or service. That’s how we’ll foster a meaningful relationship.


Good post, Amy. I think a large part of how interactions with companies feel, for lack of a better term, has to do with respect. Was the customer service rep polite? Did they listen to me? Did they give me attitude about my request or problem? I don’t need to be told I am in the right if I am not. However, I do expect to feel like I was heard and that the CSR is moving my issue closer to resolution.
I am intrigued with Yahoo!’s new Digg style Suggestion Board (I wonder if you guys were involved). While it is under the guise of “Suggestions” it is already being hammered with customer support complaints. I commend Yahoo! for moving in this direction, but I wonder what is going to happen when they start deleting posts (there are already claims this is happening) and flat out ignoring top ranked, non-revenue generating suggestions from loyal customers. I think when a company provides a forum for their customers, be it a phone number or a suggestions bulletin board, it is reasonable for the customers to expect to be both respected and heard.
Thanks for your thoughts, Shawn. I fully agree with you.
No we were not involved with the Yahoo! Answers projects. But stay tuned and you’ll see some simliar themes with our upcoming product.