<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netflix Follies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/</link>
	<description>The Get Satisfaction blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/comment-page-1/#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/#comment-5075</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not trying to be a jerk or anything, just trying to keep the story straight.  It&#039;s not an unannounced change, as (previously) the entire first paragraph seemed to say it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trying to be a jerk or anything, just trying to keep the story straight.  It&#8217;s not an unannounced change, as (previously) the entire first paragraph seemed to say it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Suesz</title>
		<link>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/comment-page-1/#comment-5069</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Suesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/#comment-5069</guid>
		<description>Tom, 

Thanks for this info. Sorry if I&#039;ve assumed too much, and thanks for (as you do more often than not) correcting people when they appear to be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, </p>
<p>Thanks for this info. Sorry if I&#8217;ve assumed too much, and thanks for (as you do more often than not) correcting people when they appear to be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/comment-page-1/#comment-5068</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/06/18/netflix-follies/#comment-5068</guid>
		<description>Eric, it seems more often than not these days you assume too much.  Check the links at the end of that post you screenshotted/linked to, and you&#039;ll see this one:

http://gregalbrecht.com/2008/06/19/netflix-profiles-going-away-boo/

Wherein, it says &quot;Dear Greg,&quot; at the start, because he&#039;s copy pasting from an e-mail they sent to all customers (I got it too).  Yes, it&#039;s a shame he didn&#039;t also post a screenshot so that you could see it was an e-mail, and that he didn&#039;t mention it was an e-mail when he said &quot;This just in&quot;, but it was still e-mailed to all customers... which is why the topic was so popular on GSFN.

It&#039;s not a &quot;secret removal&quot;, it&#039;s an announcement more than 2 months ahead of time.  Probably just to gauge interest in it and generate positive publicity when it gets a stay of execution...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, it seems more often than not these days you assume too much.  Check the links at the end of that post you screenshotted/linked to, and you&#8217;ll see this one:</p>
<p><a href="http://gregalbrecht.com/2008/06/19/netflix-profiles-going-away-boo/" rel="nofollow">http://gregalbrecht.com/2008/06/19/netflix-profiles-going-away-boo/</a></p>
<p>Wherein, it says &#8220;Dear Greg,&#8221; at the start, because he&#8217;s copy pasting from an e-mail they sent to all customers (I got it too).  Yes, it&#8217;s a shame he didn&#8217;t also post a screenshot so that you could see it was an e-mail, and that he didn&#8217;t mention it was an e-mail when he said &#8220;This just in&#8221;, but it was still e-mailed to all customers&#8230; which is why the topic was so popular on GSFN.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a &#8220;secret removal&#8221;, it&#8217;s an announcement more than 2 months ahead of time.  Probably just to gauge interest in it and generate positive publicity when it gets a stay of execution&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
