<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Demand Satisfaction! &#187; dscotthirsch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/author/dscotthirsch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com</link>
	<description>The Get Satisfaction blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:07:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Flattery Will Get You Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/11/18/flattery-will-get-you-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/11/18/flattery-will-get-you-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dscotthirsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Satisfaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readwriteweb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month, Google announced a revamp of their help forums.
The good folks at ReadWriteWeb quickly noticed that the new service behaves an awful lot like Get Satisfaction. Aww shucks! We&#8217;re really flattered &#8230; but more important, we&#8217;re happy for all the users who are going to get great support from the new system.
If I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, Google announced <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/new-google-help-forums.html">a revamp of their help forums</a>.</p>
<p>The good folks at <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_revamping_forums_change.php">ReadWriteWeb quickly noticed</a> that the new service behaves an awful lot like Get Satisfaction. Aww shucks! We&#8217;re really flattered &#8230; but more important, we&#8217;re happy for all the users who are going to get great support from the new system.</p>
<p>If I try to do some mind reading for a moment, I have a feeling that the scalability-obsessed GoogleBot realized two things:</p>
<p>1. No matter how often you update your FAQs, or how well your search algorithm works, the machine can&#8217;t always answer users&#8217; questions. It&#8217;s a &#8220;long-tail&#8221; problem, with the tail being defined by how rapidly the knowledge base needs to change.</p>
<p>2. Forums (or Google Groups, in this case) are just too uncontrollable and chaotic to effectively crowd-source customer support, and the answers &#8212; if they are there &#8212; are just too hard to find. It&#8217;s a structural problem that can&#8217;t be solved without an &#8220;outcomes orientation&#8221; built into the system.</p>
<p>These are problems that Get Satisfaction began solving more than a year ago, so here&#8217;s the part where we shamelessly market ourselves: If you have a company that wants to provide high-touch, highly scalable customer support while keeping costs low &#8212; then be like Google and use our service.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to see the Googlers jumping on the customer-service bandwagon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.getsatisfaction.com/2008/11/18/flattery-will-get-you-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
