Dopplr by Design

Dopplr hired a new community design manager, Celia. I know because I read their blog, which is a marvel of beauty and simplicity. Okay, that’s saying a lot for a blog, but it really is nicely done.

As she puts it in her first blog post for the company, her job is to “talk to the people out there who are using Dopplr, find out what’s working and what’s not, and help the development team improve things accordingly.”

Hey, that sounds familiar. That’s kind of what I do, too. Welcome to the neighborhood, Celia.

To get that feedback, she’s trying something that others have had success with in the past: soliciting advice and comments from customers via Get Satisfaction. She’s asked for input about the redesign of the Dopplr Manage Connections page.

One of the most successful examples of a company soliciting that kind of product advice on our site has been Timbuk2. They used Get Satisfaction to ask their customers to help them design a new bag.

And, boy, did they respond. Ninety-three replies later, someone had this to say:

“I’m really bummed that I didn’t see this forum earlier. I travel a LOT (>150k miles/yr) and have a large collection of bags (bit of a bagophile). I have a large collection of Timbuk2 (a laptop briefcase, messenger bags in all sizes (some doubles), accessories, and I just got a Wool Commute bag that I haven’t used yet!). I also have a large collection of Tumi (20″, 22″, 22″ expandable, 24″, trifold suit bag, bifold suit bag, rolling large suit bag). I know the design phase is over, but I’d be thrilled to give my $0.02 worth on whatever design has been arrived at.”

That was the most recent person to add to this call for ideas — which began five months ago! Sounds like Timbuk2 has found at least one superfan who’s willing to give very valuable, very free advice. Well, almost free.

I bet there are a number of you out there who have very sincere, very valuable ideas about the way Dopplr presents itself to you. You can let them know what you think about it here.

[Dopplr and Timbuk2 are on Get Satisfaction.]

___

P.s. And, if you haven’t yet seen Mahalo Daily’s faux-infomercial about Dopplr, take two minutes out of your day to enjoy it:

P.p.s. [Mahalo is also on Get Satisfaction.]

On Topic

The interface you see on Get Satisfaction has undergone a bevy of changes since we started writing the first lines of code. You may not have noticed some of them (that’s good!), but we’ve now entered an especially fruitful time for interface changes. The most recent change just went live, and it’s perhaps our largest improvement yet. We’ve redesigned how you post a topic.

The challenge we were faced with: We need to let our users do nearly anything they want when they start a new conversation. The less rules the better. We love, love, love personal expression, and we hate, hate, hate rules that constrict people. We want to make it as easy as possible for people to interact.

But, just as with any place where people converse, any community, the way people converse matters. When people ask questions that are more-or-less grammatically correct, that contain sincere emotions, that are aimed at finding solutions rather than simply ranting, — that are thoughtful — well, then other people might actually answer these questions.

Or, to put it another way, people with style and good manners get more attention when they’re seeking to get attention.

Since everyone posting to Get Satisfaction is seeking some kind of attention, we’ve tried to make that question-asking process (although it’s not just about questions) as easy as possible, while at the same time helping people make their point stylishly. We’re doing that by setting up a framing system that encourages people to ask great questions.

Now, when you start a topic, you have a clean, ordered, numbered list of actions to take. Ask your question, give it a great title, and let us know what product or service it’s about. You can also optionally add tags to topics and add emotion to make your topic even better. And that is the part we’re especially excited about: quietly encouraging everyone’s topics to be the best they can be so more people will participate and answer. To help out on that front, we’ve created a neat-o meter that lets you know what you can do to boost the chance that others will respond to your topic. Want your question about the iPhone to be more visible and enhance its chance of getting answered? We give you tips on how to accomplish that by tweaking your question.

picture-11.png

The intended side effect of this new system: We’ll all get more readable, more findable, and better results in Get Satisfaction. Providing successful, unobtrusive support like this is the Holy Grail of user interface design, and we’re incredibly excited to roll this out.

In addition, we’re on our way to better search functionality. You can now search within any company and get all the results on a page. And, if you don’t find what you need, it’s easy to start a new topic.

We’d love to hear what you think about this new design. Love, hate, or somewhere in between? Tell us all about it in this conversation we’re having about it.

Or… Start a new topic yourself right here — and tell us what you think about our new approach.

Video: Panel, “Customer Service as Community, Community as Customer Service”

Our second panel at the Customer Service is the New Marketing Summit was on the topic of “Customer Service as Community, Community as Customer Service,” and featured a bevy of Web luminaries: Tara Hunt of Citizen Agency, Matt Mullenweg of Automattic, Patti Roll of Timbuk2, Gina Bianchini of Ning, and moderated by Brian Oberkirch of Small Good Thing.

Gambling on the News

There’s fantasy baseball, why not fantasy news?

I am hardly a sports fan (I didn’t watch one minute of the Super Bowl), but ask me to put odds on the future outcome of news stories, and you’ve just captured my interest. Am I willing to bet on Obama vs. Hilary? In my mind, I’ve been doing that anyway.

Hubdub is a site that lets users track news stories and predict their outcomes. It’s gambling on the news, essentially, but with fake money. I’m not sure if wagering fake money is better or worse than wagering real money, but judging from my past experiences in Las Vegas, they’re probably doing me a favor by letting me only pretend to be a high roller.

This Digg as a stock market approach is new and novel and, of course, still in development. The rules aren’t yet set in stone, but the founders of the site refreshingly have decided to solicit as much input as possible from users about how those rules are made.

Hubdub started using Get Satisfaction when they went live with their site a few weeks ago, and participation has grown rapidly. They liked us so much they decided to turn it into a place to discuss how to settle disputes:

“A couple of users have asked if there is an escalation process if they disagree with the question settlement). At the moment there isn’t; however, I’d like to try something out. What I am proposing is when a settlement is disputed I will post the dispute here and you can comment what you think the correct settlement should be. We will then use the consensus to re-settle the question.”

This is an interesting way to use Get Satisfaction, and one that we haven’t seen before. The discussions have ranged from condemnation of the system to praise for the players to puzzlement over just how the algorithm works. One thing is for certain, it hasn’t been dull. But input from this community, on the whole, has been quite positive, and I was pleased when I read this post:

“Wow, a forum without a flame war! How refreshing is that 8^)”

new_hub2.png

Would that sentiment ring as true if actual money were changing hands on Hubdub? Perhaps not. Either way, I’m going to mark that one as a “win” for Get Satisfaction. And ante up for the next round.

[Hubdub is on Get Satisfaction.]

Introducing the Company-Customer Pact

When we were putting the speaker list together for our Customer Service is the New Marketing Summit, we were laser-focused on the practical. We rounded up speakers like Tony from Zappos and Robert from The Geek Squad to talk about specific actions they took to make their company customer-oriented, so attendees would be able to learn from or even emulate those steps and achieve equally effective results.

But along the way we realized that anecdotal evidence — even solid, practical, billion-dollars-a-year-in-revenue evidence — while a strong start, just wasn’t enough. And so we asked ourselves: How can we help evolve the conversation that companies and customers are having? What can we bring to the table that will help these companies communicate better — more effectively, more honestly, more transparently — with their customers? What hasn’t been said but needs to be?

With this goal in mind, we launched at the Summit an essentially open source document we’re calling, simply, The Company-Customer Pact.

This pact is a call for shared responsibility between companies & customers — one that promises that both sides will hold up their end of the bargain to change the game. The document provides a way to opt into a set of shared values. It’s a balanced statement of responsibilities for companies and customers.

You might wonder why we need this, as it seems like common sense. But if common sense were enough more people would be employing these principles now. We’ve been trained by the bad habits of corporate culture to turn away from the anger of alienated customers reacting to an environment where it’s common place for companies to hide behind phone trees, avoid fault, and employ anonymous and in-human call centers that makes them hard if not impossible to reach. Or by engaging in practices like price-gauging and issuing confusing bills and policies.

And what’s the customers response to this, now that, thanks to the tubes that power the Internet, the customers can respond? More often than not it’s revolt, whether led by one man’s descent into Dell Hell or an entire (digg)nation rising up to defend their right to recite a seemingly random string of letters and numbers. But revolt, as any Frenchman from the 18th century will tell you, while thrilling, isn’t particularly pleasant, and it’s definitely not sustainable. We need another way.

Previous attempts at such documents usually end up coming from the company side as a “Consumer’s Bill of Rights,” the most notable of which was put forth by JFK in a speech he gave in 1962. (Never heard of it? Yeah, neither had we.) A customer bill of rights is a start, but that’s unilateral disarmament. This pact is bilateral disarmament; both sides holster their flamethrowers and try to work it out.

The central thesis of the Company-Customer Pact is that at some point we are all working on behalf of a company, and at the same time we are all customers. We all spend time on either side of that fence, and we should take our understanding of each of those roles into whatever situation we’re in. In that regard, while this Company-Customer Pact speaks to two sides, it’s really speaking to one side — the human side.

Customers can expect more from a company that’s signed onto this document. And whie it’s impossible for a company to tell its customers how to behave, they can certainly ask, and by opting into a pact like this they can imply a sense of shared responsibility with their customers. And a statement like this can even give a company’s internal teams some guiding principles for their behavior.

This is an open initiative — a living document. We want your feedback, which is why we’ve posted it on a wiki where anyone can comment or edit. Keep in mind, though, that one of the goals is to have it be simple enough that anyone can adopt it. It contains five basic tenets:

1. The first point reiterates, because it can’t be said enough, the golden rule of “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

2. The second point warms against the temptation to anonymity, because more often than not, in commercial settings anonymous often gives license to be rude.

3. The third point reflects the fact that we all know in advance that mistakes wil be made and that problems are going to happen — to err is human, after all, and we’re both humans on either side of the line. We can embrace this as an opportunity to deal honestly with problems as they arise; done right, this is where lasting customer relationships are forged. Who hasn’t had the experience of seeing a company turn a bad situation around, creating a tremendous amount of customer loyalty?

4. The fourth point is about companies embracing the opportunity of instant, always-on communication. Now that it’s easier than ever before to get the word out to hundreds of our friends and co-workers, it’s somehow harder than ever to communicate with some of the companies we do business with. There is absolutely a mandate to make honest and direct communication between companies and customers as easy and frictionless as it is with the people you friend on Facebook.

5. Finally, it’s vital to show follow-through and to support those who are trying to follow through. It’s a new world, and we all have to live in it together, so let’s cut each other some slack, ok?

Pretty simple all said and done, but also potentially very powerful. If you haven’t done so yet, check it out at ccpact.com and add your name — as a customer, as a company representative, or as both. We’d love to have you take part in the conversation.